Amp vs Supermaven
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, and use cases to help you decide which fits your AI stack.
Track Amp and Supermaven before the next renewal
Create a free tracker from this comparison and see renewals, overlap, and total monthly AI spend in one place.
Agentic coding tool from Sourcegraph with CLI and editor integration, billed per usage.
- Coding agent in the CLI and VS Code
- Pay-per-use credit billing, no fixed subscription
- Multi-file agent edits with shell access
- Thread sharing for team collaboration
- Free starting credits for evaluation
Fast code completion with a large context window for whole-codebase awareness.
- Low-latency inline code completion
- Large context window for codebase awareness
- Chat with code context
- VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim plugins
- Free tier with core completions
Quick comparison
| Feature | Amp | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Code Assistant | AI Code Assistant |
| Monthly price | Free/mo | $10/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Plan name | Pay as you go | Pro |
Who should pick which?
Choose Amp if you value coding agent in the cli and vs code and pay-per-use credit billing, no fixed subscription.
Choose Supermaven if you value low-latency inline code completion and large context window for codebase awareness.
Check renewal cost before choosing
Compare Amp and Supermaven against pricing pages, alternatives, and the full AI stack tracker workflow.
Track both in one place
SubHorizon tracks Amp, Supermaven, and the rest of your AI stack so you see renewals, catch overlap, and stop paying twice.