Augment Code vs Amp
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, and use cases to help you decide which fits your AI stack.
Track Augment Code and Amp before the next renewal
Create a free tracker from this comparison and see renewals, overlap, and total monthly AI spend in one place.
AI coding platform with a Context Engine that indexes large codebases and multi-agent workflows.
- Context Engine indexes large codebases and monorepos
- Auggie CLI agent for terminal workflows
- Intent workspace for multi-agent coordination
- Built-in AI code review
- Credit-based pricing across plans
Agentic coding tool from Sourcegraph with CLI and editor integration, billed per usage.
- Coding agent in the CLI and VS Code
- Pay-per-use credit billing, no fixed subscription
- Multi-file agent edits with shell access
- Thread sharing for team collaboration
- Free starting credits for evaluation
Quick comparison
| Feature | Augment Code | Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Code Assistant | AI Code Assistant |
| Monthly price | $20/mo | Free/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Plan name | Indie | Pay as you go |
Who should pick which?
Choose Augment Code if you value context engine indexes large codebases and monorepos and auggie cli agent for terminal workflows.
Choose Amp if you value coding agent in the cli and vs code and pay-per-use credit billing, no fixed subscription.
Check renewal cost before choosing
Compare Augment Code and Amp against pricing pages, alternatives, and the full AI stack tracker workflow.
Track both in one place
SubHorizon tracks Augment Code, Amp, and the rest of your AI stack so you see renewals, catch overlap, and stop paying twice.