Cursor vs Bolt
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, and use cases to help you decide which fits your AI stack.
Track Cursor and Bolt before the next renewal
Start your free trial from this comparison and see renewals, overlap, and total monthly AI spend in one place.
AI-native code editor with credit-based model access and composer for multi-file edits.
- Unlimited Tab completions and Auto mode
- Composer for multi-file edits
- Credit-based access to Claude, GPT, Gemini
- Codebase-aware chat
- Built on VS Code
Prompt-to-app builder with framework flexibility and Figma import for rapid prototyping.
- Full-stack app generation from prompts
- Framework-agnostic (React, Vue, Svelte, Astro)
- Figma import and AI image editing
- Netlify deployment integration
- Claude Opus 4.6 model access
Quick comparison
| Feature | Cursor | Bolt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Code Editor | AI App Builder |
| Monthly price | $20/mo | $25/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Plan name | Pro | Pro |
Who should pick which?
Choose Cursor if you value unlimited tab completions and auto mode and composer for multi-file edits.
Choose Bolt if you value full-stack app generation from prompts and framework-agnostic (react, vue, svelte, astro).
Check renewal cost before choosing
Compare Cursor and Bolt against pricing pages, alternatives, and the full AI stack tracker workflow.
Track both in one place
SubHorizon tracks Cursor, Bolt, and the rest of your AI stack so you see renewals, catch overlap, and stop paying twice.