Cursor vs Zed
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, and use cases to help you decide which fits your AI stack.
Track Cursor and Zed before the next renewal
Start your free trial from this comparison and see renewals, overlap, and total monthly AI spend in one place.
AI-native code editor with credit-based model access and composer for multi-file edits.
- Unlimited Tab completions and Auto mode
- Composer for multi-file edits
- Credit-based access to Claude, GPT, Gemini
- Codebase-aware chat
- Built on VS Code
Rust-based high-performance editor with agentic editing and Agent Client Protocol.
- Agentic editing for codebase-spanning edits
- Token-based AI with Claude, GPT-5, Gemini
- Agent Client Protocol (ACP) support
- Extremely fast (Rust-based, GPU rendering)
- Real-time multiplayer collaboration
Quick comparison
| Feature | Cursor | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Code Editor | Code Editor |
| Monthly price | $20/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Plan name | Pro | Pro |
Who should pick which?
Choose Cursor if you value unlimited tab completions and auto mode and composer for multi-file edits.
Choose Zed if you value agentic editing for codebase-spanning edits and token-based ai with claude, gpt-5, gemini.
Check renewal cost before choosing
Compare Cursor and Zed against pricing pages, alternatives, and the full AI stack tracker workflow.
Track both in one place
SubHorizon tracks Cursor, Zed, and the rest of your AI stack so you see renewals, catch overlap, and stop paying twice.